Your Tax Window Doesn’t Close All at Once

Most retirees think of their low-tax years as one window.

The paycheck stops. Required distributions are still years away. And in between, there’s a stretch where you control how much taxable income shows up on your return.

That’s true, certainly.

But it isn’t the whole picture.

Because that window doesn’t close all at once. It closes in stages, one door at a time.

And if you don’t know the order, you can lose your best planning years before you realize they’re gone.

The Window Isn’t One Opening

I’ve written before about the retirement tax window most people miss. It’s the gap between your working-income years and your forced-income years.

For many retirees, those years offer rare control over their tax bill.

Now here’s the thing. That control has limits, and the limits change as you move through retirement.

A Roth conversion that looks attractive on this year’s return could raise your Medicare premiums two years from now.

Selling appreciated stock could land in a higher capital-gains bracket than you planned.

And once Social Security starts, it shares whatever bracket space is left.

So the question isn’t just: Do I have a tax window?

It becomes: Which move belongs in which year, before its door closes?

Medicare Starts Counting Before You Enroll

The first door most people miss is Medicare.

That’s because Medicare doesn’t look at this year’s income when it sets your premiums. According to the Social Security Administration, it generally looks at your tax return from two years earlier.

Higher income triggers surcharges on Part B and Part D premiums, known as IRMAA.

So income at 63 can affect your premiums at 65.

To be sure, retirement may support a request to use your more recent, lower income. But that only accounts for the lost paycheck. It doesn’t erase conversion income you chose to create.

In my planning work, this is the constraint that comes up most often.

And it means every conversion after 63 has to pass a second test. Is the long-term benefit worth the surcharge it could trigger?

Then Come the Deductions, Benefits, and Distributions

Medicare isn’t the only door.

If you’re 65 or older, the new senior deduction can be worth up to $6,000 per person from 2025 through 2028. But the IRS phases it out once modified adjusted gross income exceeds $150,000 for married couples. A large conversion can shrink it or erase it. I covered the details in The New Senior Deduction Most People Don’t Know About.

Social Security changes the income mix again.

Depending on your combined income, up to 85% of your benefits can be included in taxable income. That’s the portion subject to tax, not an 85% tax rate. And until you reach that maximum, extra withdrawals or conversions can pull more of your benefits onto your return.

Then come required minimum distributions.

Under current IRS rules, people born in 1960 or later generally begin RMDs at 75. Those withdrawals arrive whether you need the money or not. And the RMD itself can’t be converted to a Roth.

If you’re retiring before 65 and relying on Marketplace health coverage, there’s one more door. Conversions and realized gains count toward the income that sets your premium assistance. With the enhanced credits expired after 2025, crossing 400% of the federal poverty level can eliminate that assistance entirely.

None of these milestones ends the opportunity.

They change its price.

And sometimes a door opens wider. Once you’re fully on Medicare, for example, the Marketplace constraint disappears.

Consider a Couple Retiring at 64

Consider, for example, a hypothetical couple, both 64.

They have a seven-figure IRA, a taxable account that produces steady dividends, and a healthy cash reserve. One spouse also has nonqualified deferred compensation that pays out over five years after retirement. Both were born after 1959, and they plan to delay Social Security.

At first glance, they have about a decade before RMDs begin.

In practice, they have several distinct phases.

The first is the retirement year itself.

Salary, a final bonus, vacation payouts, and any year-end equity vesting may leave less room than they expect. Leaving work in September doesn’t turn the whole calendar year into a low-income year.

The second is the deferred comp years.

This is the piece many households overlook. Each payout is ordinary income in the year it arrives. So it fills part of the bracket space they were counting on for conversions.

The question isn’t how much room the bracket offers.

It’s how much room is left after the payout.

The third is the Medicare transition.

Because of the two-year lookback, a conversion at 64 can affect their premiums at 66. Income at 65 can affect premiums at 67.

Conversions and Capital Gains Compete for the Same Room

Once both are on Medicare, but before Social Security begins, our couple may have their most flexible years.

They’re also the years when Roth conversions and capital-gains planning start to compete.

How so?

Well, long-term gains stack on top of ordinary income in the federal tax calculation.

For a household like this, dividends and interest often fill much of the 0% capital-gains bracket on their own. So the real decision is usually whether gains land at 15% or 20%, and whether they cross into the 3.8% net investment income tax above $250,000 of modified adjusted gross income.

Every dollar of conversion income pushes their gains closer to those lines.

One year might favor shrinking the pretax balance.

Another might favor selling appreciated holdings to diversify or rebuild the cash reserve.

But you can’t maximize both in the same year and assume the results will fit together.

Then Social Security starts, and we rebuild the projection. Benefits cover more of their spending, which can reduce withdrawals. But the taxable portion takes up room that conversions used to have.

And by 75, RMDs become part of the baseline.

You can’t carry this year’s unused bracket space into next year.

Each phase offers a different amount of room, at a different price.

This Is How I Turn the Timeline Into a Decision

In our planning process, we don’t start with “How much should you convert?”

We start with a retirement income map. What does the household need to spend? What income will arrive each year? And which accounts will cover the difference?

The spending number deserves particular attention.

In one recent engagement, reconciling a couple’s bank activity showed several categories running above the figures they’d given us.

Here’s why that matters for taxes. If withdrawals must cover more spending than expected, there’s less room for conversions. And there’s less cash to pay the tax on them.

From there, we pair long-term cash-flow modeling in eMoney with annual tax projections in Holistiplan. The long view estimates future income needs and tax-deferred balances. The annual projection tests what a move costs now.

Then we compare alternatives.

A smaller conversion.

A larger one.

Realizing gains instead.

Or holding the room for a later year.

Sometimes accepting a Medicare surcharge makes sense because the long-term benefit is larger. Sometimes protecting the cash reserve comes first.

Either way, the tradeoff should be deliberate.

Because a Roth conversion isn’t the goal. It’s a tool for lowering your lifetime tax bill.

That’s also why we revisit the projection before implementation, once the year’s actual income and gains are clearer.

The Bottom Line

Your low-tax window is real.

But it’s a sequence of decisions, not one.

What this means is that before you choose a strategy, you need the dates. Your final working year. Each spouse’s Medicare enrollment. Any deferred comp payout schedule. Your Social Security claims. And your RMD starting ages.

Then layer in the income already expected each year and the withdrawals your lifestyle requires.

Only then can you see where each strategy fits.

So map the milestones.

Match each strategy to the years when it works best.

And act before each door closes.

Related Reading

The Retirement Tax Window Most People Miss

The Withdrawal Order You Were Taught Can Quietly Cost You

The Tax Cost of Retiring Without a Retirement Income Map

A Roth Conversion Is Not the Goal

Sources

Social Security Administration, “Premiums: Rules for Higher-Income Beneficiaries.”

https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/medicare/medicare-premiums.html

Internal Revenue Service, “One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act: Tax Deductions for Working Americans and Seniors.”

https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/one-big-beautiful-bill-act-tax-deductions-for-working-americans-and-seniors

Social Security Administration, “Must I Pay Taxes on Social Security Benefits?”

https://www.ssa.gov/faqs/en/questions/KA-02471.html

Internal Revenue Service, “Retirement Plan and IRA Required Minimum Distributions FAQs.”

https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/retirement-plan-and-ira-required-minimum-distributions-faqs

HealthCare.gov, “What’s Included as Income.”

https://www.healthcare.gov/income-and-household-information/income/

Internal Revenue Service, “Topic No. 409, Capital Gains and Losses.”

https://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc409

Internal Revenue Service, “Net Investment Income Tax.”

https://www.irs.gov/individuals/net-investment-income-tax

Peter Donisanu, ChFC®, AIF®

Peter Donisanu, ChFC®, AIF®, is Chief Wealth & Tax Strategist at Franklin Madison Private Wealth and previously served as a senior investment strategy analyst at Wells Fargo Investment Institute, where he contributed to portfolio guidance for institutional and private wealth clients. He works with high-net-worth retirees and pre-retirees on retirement planning, tax-aware wealth strategies, equity compensation, and sudden wealth preservation, helping clients approach major financial decisions with clarity, confidence, and peace of mind.

Privacy Preference Center

Discover more from Franklin Madison Advisors - Private Wealth Management

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading