Blog

The Retirement Tax Window Most People Miss

Some people think retirement tax planning begins when required minimum distributions show up.

That is understandable.

For decades, the retirement tax conversation has been framed around age-based triggers. Social Security. Medicare. Pension elections. Required minimum distributions. Roth conversions. Charitable distributions. Estate planning.

And because many of those decisions become more visible later in retirement, it is easy to assume the real planning does not begin until then.

But that is often too late.

For many retirees, one of the most valuable tax-planning windows opens in the years just before and just after retirement. It is the period after earned income declines, but before every major retirement income source has fully started.

I think of this as the retirement tax gap.

It is the gap between your working-income years and your forced-income years.

And if you miss it, you may not get the same opportunity again.

Why This Window Matters

During your working years, your tax picture is often driven by your paycheck.

You may have salary, bonus income, business income, equity compensation, deferred compensation, or other income tied to work. Even if you are saving aggressively, your flexibility can be limited because your taxable income is already high.

Then retirement begins.

For some households, income drops quickly. The paycheck stops. Bonus income disappears. Equity compensation may slow or end. Business income may decline. And for a few years, the tax return may look very different from the one you had while working.

But that lower-income period may not last forever.

Social Security may begin later. Pension income may start. Medicare premiums may be affected by income. Required minimum distributions eventually force money out of tax-deferred retirement accounts. Under current IRS rules, retirement account owners generally must begin RMDs starting with the year they reach age 73, though the rules can vary by birth year, account type, and retirement plan details.

That creates a planning gap.

Not a loophole.

Not a trick.

A window.

And in retirement planning, windows matter because timing can be just as important as the strategy itself.

The Mistake Is Waiting Until the Tax Bill Arrives

The problem is that many people do not think about retirement taxes until something forces the issue.

The first large IRA distribution.

The first RMD.

The first Medicare surcharge.

The first year Social Security becomes taxable.

The first year a surviving spouse files as a single taxpayer.

By then, the options may be narrower.

This is one of the reasons retirement tax planning should not be treated as a once-a-year tax filing exercise. Tax filing looks backward. Planning looks forward.

Your tax return tells you what happened.

Your retirement income timeline helps you decide what to do next.

That distinction matters.

Because the years before RMDs begin may offer more flexibility to decide where income comes from, which assets to reposition, how much ordinary income to recognize, and whether it makes sense to reduce future tax pressure before it becomes mandatory.

How We Evaluate the Retirement Tax Gap

In our planning work, we do not start with the question, “How much should you convert to Roth?”

That question comes later.

We start by building the income timeline.

That means looking year by year at when earned income stops, when Social Security may begin, when pension income starts, when Medicare begins, when RMDs begin, and when taxable portfolio income may change.

Then we look for years where the client has unusual control over taxable income.

That control is the key.

Some retirement income is voluntary. Some is forced. Some is predictable. Some is market-dependent. Some is tied to tax law. Some is tied to health, longevity, or family needs.

The planning opportunity exists when you have enough flexibility to make deliberate decisions before the rules make more of those decisions for you.

A useful retirement tax gap review should ask:

1. When does earned income stop or materially decline?
2. When do guaranteed income sources begin?
3. When do Medicare and RMD rules start to matter?
4. Which years offer the most control over taxable income?
5. What future tax problem are we trying to reduce?

That last question is important.

The goal is not to create taxable income just because a lower bracket exists. The goal is to determine whether using part of that bracket today may reduce a larger tax problem later.

What Can Be Done During the Window?

The retirement tax window is not about doing one thing.

It is about evaluating several moving pieces together.

For some retirees, that may include Roth conversions. The idea is not simply to convert as much as possible. The better question is whether recognizing income today may reduce the risk of larger taxable IRA distributions later.

But Roth conversions are not automatically the right answer.

A conversion may increase current-year income. It may create a larger tax bill today. It may affect Medicare premiums in a future year because Medicare income-related monthly adjustment amounts are based on modified adjusted gross income. Higher income can increase Part B and Part D premium costs for certain beneficiaries.

That does not mean Roth conversions should be avoided.

It means they should be measured.

For other retirees, the opportunity may be capital gain management. If income is temporarily lower, there may be room to realize gains, diversify a concentrated position, or rebalance a taxable portfolio in a more deliberate way.

For others, it may be asset location. This means looking at which assets belong in taxable accounts, tax-deferred accounts, and Roth accounts so that the overall portfolio is not just invested well, but also distributed tax-efficiently over time.

For charitably inclined retirees, the conversation may eventually include qualified charitable distributions once eligible.

For households delaying Social Security, the years before benefits begin may create a unique planning period. Delaying Social Security beyond full retirement age can increase the eventual retirement benefit through delayed retirement credits, though the right claiming decision depends on health, cash flow, longevity, survivor needs, and the broader plan.

None of these decisions should be made in isolation.

That is the point.

The retirement tax window is valuable because several decisions overlap at once. Income planning, portfolio planning, tax planning, Medicare planning, Social Security planning, estate planning, and cash flow planning all start to interact.

A Simple Example

Consider a married couple who retires at 62.

During their working years, their household income was high. Between salary, bonuses, and investment income, they did not have much room to recognize additional taxable income without pushing themselves into a higher tax bracket.

They retire at 62 and decide to delay Social Security until 67.

They do not have a pension starting immediately. They have taxable savings, traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs, and a brokerage account. Their living expenses are covered partly from cash and partly from taxable investments.

For the first time in years, their taxable income is meaningfully lower.

That five-year period from age 62 to 67 may be one of the most important tax-planning periods of their retirement.

They may have room to convert part of a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA.

They may be able to realize capital gains in a controlled way.

They may be able to diversify appreciated investments without creating the same tax impact they would have faced during their peak earning years.

They may be able to reduce the size of future RMDs.

They may be able to build more tax flexibility for the surviving spouse later in life.

But only if they see the window before it closes.

Because once Social Security begins, pension income starts, portfolio income grows, and RMDs enter the picture, the tax return can fill back up quickly.

That does not mean planning is impossible later.

It just means the easiest planning years may have already passed.

The Window Is Not Always Obvious

One reason people miss this opportunity is that retirement feels like a cash flow event, not a tax event.

Most new retirees are focused on practical questions.

Can I afford to stop working?

Where will my monthly income come from?

How much can I safely spend?

Should I claim Social Security now or later?

How do I avoid running out of money?

Those are the right questions.

But there is another question that should sit beside them:

What will my tax return look like over the next 10 to 15 years?

Not just this year.

Not just next year.

The full timeline.

That timeline may reveal that income is low for a short period, then rises later. Or it may reveal that income looks manageable while both spouses are alive, but becomes less efficient for the surviving spouse. Or it may show that doing nothing today could create larger forced distributions later.

This is where retirement tax planning becomes more than tax preparation.

It becomes coordination.

The Goal Is Not to Pay the Lowest Tax This Year

This is important.

Good retirement tax planning is not always about minimizing this year’s tax bill.

Sometimes the lowest tax bill today creates a higher lifetime tax cost later.

That can happen when retirees avoid taking IRA distributions in their 60s, only to face larger RMDs in their 70s. It can happen when a married couple fails to plan for the surviving spouse’s future tax brackets. It can happen when Medicare surcharges, Social Security taxation, capital gains, and retirement distributions all collide in the same year.

The better goal is not to avoid tax at all costs.

The better goal is to manage taxes over a lifetime.

That requires looking at the sequence of income, not just the amount of income.

It also requires humility.

Tax laws can change. Investment returns will not follow a straight line. Health needs, family needs, and spending needs may evolve. A good plan should be flexible enough to adjust as the facts change.

Before You Make a Move, Ask Better Questions

The retirement tax gap can create planning flexibility, but flexibility is not the same thing as certainty.

Before making a Roth conversion, realizing capital gains, delaying Social Security, or drawing from one account instead of another, it is worth asking:

What tax bracket are we filling today?

What future tax bracket are we trying to avoid?

Could this decision affect Medicare premiums?

Does this create enough cash flow for the next few years?

How does this affect the surviving spouse?

Are we coordinating this with the investment plan, estate plan, and charitable plan?

That is the difference between a tax move and a retirement strategy.

A tax move looks at one transaction.

A retirement strategy looks at the sequence of decisions.

Start Before the First RMD

The retirement tax window most people miss is not hidden because it is complicated.

It is hidden because it arrives during a transition.

You are leaving work.

You are figuring out cash flow.

You are deciding when to claim benefits.

You are adjusting to a new rhythm of life.

And in the middle of that transition, there may be a short period when your tax picture gives you more room to plan than you had before and may have again.

That is why retirement tax planning should begin before the first RMD shows up.

Before Social Security is automatically deposited.

Before Medicare premiums surprise you.

Before the tax return starts telling you what you should have planned for years earlier.

The starting point is simple:

Build your retirement income timeline.

Look at when earned income stops, when Social Security may begin, when pension income starts, when RMDs begin, and when large taxable events may occur.

Then ask what can be done in the lower-income years to create more flexibility later.

Because in retirement, the best tax move is not always found after the problem appears.

Sometimes it is found in the quiet years before everyone else starts paying attention.

This material is for educational purposes only and should not be treated as personalized tax, legal, or investment advice. Retirement tax strategies should be evaluated in light of your full financial picture and coordinated with your tax professional before implementation.

---

by Peter Donisanu, ChFC®, AIF®

The New Senior Deduction Most People Don’t Know About

Most retirees know about the standard deduction.

Some know there’s already an extra standard deduction once you reach age 65.

But beginning in 2025, there’s another senior tax deduction that many people may not know about yet.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act created a temporary additional deduction for taxpayers age 65 and older. For 2025 through 2028, eligible taxpayers may be able to claim up to an additional $6,000 per person. For a married couple where both spouses qualify, that could mean up to $12,000 in additional deductions.

And this is on top of the existing senior standard deduction already in the tax code.

According to the IRS, the deduction applies from 2025 through 2028, is available to taxpayers age 65 and older, and begins phasing out when modified adjusted gross income exceeds $75,000 for single filers or $150,000 for married couples filing jointly. The IRS also notes that the deduction is available to eligible taxpayers whether they itemize or claim the standard deduction.

Now, that may sound like a simple tax break.

But for retirees, it could be more than that.

It could change the math on Roth conversions, IRA withdrawals, capital gains, and how much taxable income you can recognize before the tax cost starts to climb.

Why This Matters

Retirement tax planning is often about finding windows.

There may be a window after you stop working but before Social Security begins.

There may be another window before pensions start.

And there may be a window before required minimum distributions begin.

For some retirees, these years can be especially valuable because taxable income may be lower than it was during the working years and lower than it may be later in retirement.

That matters because lower-income years can create flexibility.

You may be able to convert part of a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA.

You may be able to realize capital gains at a lower tax cost.

You may be able to reposition assets before required minimum distributions begin.

And you may be able to fill up a tax bracket intentionally instead of letting future income push you into a higher one later.

That’s where this new senior deduction comes in.

For taxpayers age 65 and older, the deduction may create another layer of flexibility during a limited planning window.

Now, that doesn’t mean everyone should immediately do a larger Roth conversion.

It doesn’t mean the deduction eliminates taxes.

And it doesn’t mean every retiree will qualify for the full amount.

Instead, the better planning question is this:

Does this deduction change how much income I can recognize before I cross an important tax threshold?

That’s where the planning value may show up.

The Deduction Isn’t the Strategy

One of the mistakes people make with tax planning is looking at a new rule in isolation.

A new deduction shows up, and the instinct is to ask, “How do I use it?”

But that’s not always the right starting point.

In retirement tax planning, the deduction is only one input. The real question is how it affects the broader income plan.

That means looking at the deduction alongside Roth conversion sizing, traditional IRA withdrawals, capital gains, Social Security taxation, Medicare IRMAA thresholds, required minimum distributions, charitable giving, and surviving spouse tax exposure.

That’s where this new senior deduction becomes more interesting.

It may not change the entire plan.

But it may change the margin.

And in retirement tax planning, the margin matters.

A few thousand dollars of additional deduction may determine whether more IRA money can be converted at an acceptable tax cost. It may reduce the tax drag on income that was already going to be recognized. Or it may create a little more room before a taxpayer bumps into a bracket, phaseout, or other income-sensitive threshold.

That’s why this should be modeled, not guessed at.

A Simple Example

Consider a married couple, both age 66.

They recently retired. They haven’t started required minimum distributions yet. They’re delaying Social Security. And for the next few years, they’re living partly from cash reserves and taxable investments.

They also have a meaningful balance in traditional IRAs.

Suppose their projected taxable income before Roth conversions is $90,000.

Before the new senior deduction, their tax projection may have suggested converting only a certain amount from their IRA to a Roth IRA while staying within a target taxable income range.

But now, from 2025 through 2028, this couple may have up to $12,000 of additional deductions available because both spouses are over age 65.

That doesn’t make a Roth conversion tax-free.

But it may allow them to recognize more income before reaching the same taxable income level they would have reached under the old rules.

For example, if they were originally planning a $50,000 Roth conversion, the new deduction may reduce the taxable impact of that conversion. Or, if their goal was to fill a specific tax bracket without going beyond it, the deduction may allow them to convert somewhat more than they otherwise could have.

Of course, the exact number would depend on their full tax return.

Their Social Security income, pension income, capital gains, charitable giving, deductions, and modified adjusted gross income all matter.

But the planning point is still important.

The same Roth conversion that looked slightly too large before may now fit more comfortably inside the plan.

Or, if they were already planning to convert a set amount, the new deduction may reduce the tax cost of that conversion.

That’s why the new rule matters.

It’s not just a deduction sitting on a tax return.

It can affect the retirement income plan.

How We’d Evaluate This in a Retirement Tax Projection

When looking at a rule like this, the first step isn’t to assume it creates an opportunity.

The first step is to test it.

In a retirement tax projection, we’d want to answer several questions.

First, does the taxpayer qualify based on age and filing status?

The deduction is tied to taxpayers age 65 and older. For married couples, the $12,000 maximum applies when both spouses qualify. If only one spouse qualifies, the maximum benefit may be lower.

Second, is the deduction fully available or partially phased out?

This matters because the phaseout begins once modified adjusted gross income exceeds the applicable threshold. So, a taxpayer with significant IRA withdrawals, capital gains, pension income, or Roth conversions may reduce or lose part of the benefit.

Third, what income would have been recognized anyway?

If a retiree was already planning IRA withdrawals, capital gains, or a Roth conversion, the deduction may reduce the tax cost of income already built into the plan.

Fourth, does the deduction create more room for strategic income?

This is where Roth conversions come into the picture. The additional deduction may allow some taxpayers to convert more IRA assets before reaching the same taxable income target.

Fifth, what other thresholds are affected?

This is where the analysis can get more complicated.

A Roth conversion may reduce future RMDs, but it can also increase modified adjusted gross income today. Capital gains may be taxed favorably, but they can still affect other parts of the return. And Medicare IRMAA thresholds may be based on income measures that don’t always move the same way as taxable income.

Finally, what happens after 2028?

Because the deduction is scheduled to be temporary, it should be viewed as part of a limited planning window. The question isn’t only whether the deduction helps this year. The question is whether it changes the sequence of decisions between 2025 and 2028.

That’s the difference between tax preparation and tax planning.

Tax preparation reports what happened.

Tax planning asks what should happen next.

Where This Can Show Up

The most obvious place this deduction may matter is Roth conversion planning.

For retirees in their 60s and early 70s, Roth conversions are often evaluated year by year. The goal isn’t simply to convert as much as possible. The goal is to convert the right amount based on current tax rates, future required minimum distributions, Social Security taxation, Medicare premiums, estate goals, and survivor-tax exposure.

A new deduction changes one input in that calculation.

But Roth conversions aren’t the only area affected.

This deduction may also matter when deciding whether to realize capital gains, especially for retirees managing appreciated taxable investments.

It may matter when choosing whether to draw from an IRA, a taxable account, or cash.

It may matter when coordinating charitable giving strategies, including whether qualified charitable distributions may become more attractive later.

And it may matter for taxpayers who are trying to manage income around Medicare surcharge thresholds.

That last point is important.

The deduction may reduce taxable income, but retirees still need to pay attention to modified adjusted gross income, especially when Medicare IRMAA thresholds are involved. A deduction may help with the income tax calculation, but it doesn’t automatically make every income-related threshold disappear.

This is where many retirement tax mistakes happen.

People look at one tax benefit in isolation.

But retirement tax planning doesn’t work in isolation.

Your IRA withdrawal affects your taxable income.

Your taxable income can affect how much of your Social Security is taxed.

Your modified adjusted gross income can affect Medicare premiums.

Your Roth conversion can reduce future required minimum distributions but increase this year’s tax bill.

And your capital gains can look manageable until they interact with everything else on the return.

So, while the new senior deduction may create an opportunity, it still needs to be modeled inside the full retirement income plan.

Three Questions to Ask Before Using the New Senior Deduction

Before making a Roth conversion, IRA withdrawal, or capital gain decision around this deduction, there are three questions worth asking.

#1 Will I Actually Qualify for the Deduction?

The maximum deduction isn’t the same as the available deduction.

Age matters.

Filing status matters.

Modified adjusted gross income matters.

And for higher-income retirees, the phaseout may reduce or eliminate the benefit.

That means the first step isn’t estimating the deduction in isolation. The first step is estimating income for the year and seeing whether the deduction is still available after all other income is included.

#2 What Income Should I Recognize While the Deduction Exists?

If the deduction creates more room, the next question is how to use that room.

For some retirees, the best answer may be a larger Roth conversion.

For others, it may be realizing capital gains.

For others, it may be taking IRA distributions earlier than required to reduce future RMD pressure.

And for some, the best answer may be to do nothing because the additional income would create other tax or Medicare issues.

That’s why context matters.

The deduction doesn’t tell you what to do.

It simply changes the tax math around the decision.

#3 What Future Problem Am I Trying to Reduce?

This is the most important question.

A Roth conversion isn’t valuable simply because there’s room to do one. It’s valuable if it helps reduce a future tax problem.

That future problem could be large required minimum distributions.

It could be higher taxable income after Social Security and pensions begin.

It could be the surviving spouse eventually filing as a single taxpayer.

It could be heirs inheriting pre-tax retirement accounts.

Or it could be a lack of tax flexibility later in retirement.

Without a clear future problem to solve, the deduction can become a distraction.

But with a clear future problem, it can become a useful planning tool.

The Temporary Nature Matters

There’s another reason this deserves attention.

The deduction is temporary.

As currently structured, it applies for 2025 through 2028.

That means it may create a four-year planning window for eligible taxpayers.

And temporary windows are often where tax planning becomes most valuable.

If you’re 65 or older during this period, the question isn’t just whether you qualify this year. It’s whether the deduction changes the sequence of decisions you make over the next several years.

Should you convert more IRA money before required minimum distributions begin?

Should you realize gains while your taxable income is lower?

Should you draw from pre-tax accounts now to reduce pressure later?

Should you delay or accelerate income based on where you fall relative to the phaseout range?

Should you revisit a plan that was built before this deduction existed?

These aren’t generic questions.

They depend on your income, your assets, your filing status, your age, your Social Security timing, your Medicare status, your charitable intent, and your long-term goals.

But the key point is simple.

If your retirement tax plan was built before this new senior deduction, then it may already be outdated.

Don’t Chase the Deduction

That said, this isn’t something to chase blindly.

A $6,000 deduction, or even a $12,000 deduction for a married couple, is meaningful. But it shouldn’t drive the entire plan.

Sometimes, doing a larger Roth conversion still doesn’t make sense.

Sometimes, staying below a Medicare surcharge threshold matters more.

Sometimes, preserving liquidity is more important than accelerating income.

Sometimes, future tax savings aren’t worth the current tax cost.

And sometimes, the deduction phases out before it provides much benefit at all.

That’s why the planning process matters.

The deduction is an input.

It’s not the strategy.

The strategy is deciding how to use your lower-income retirement years wisely before future income becomes less flexible.

The Bottom Line

The new senior deduction is easy to overlook.

But for taxpayers age 65 and older, it may change the tax math from 2025 through 2028.

For some retirees, it may reduce the tax cost of income they were already planning to recognize.

For others, it may create additional room for Roth conversions, IRA withdrawals, or capital gains.

And for many, it should be a reason to revisit the retirement income plan before making year-end tax decisions.

The goal isn’t to chase a deduction.

The goal is to understand whether this temporary rule gives you more flexibility while the window is open.

Because in retirement tax planning, the best opportunities often show up before they become obvious.

And by the time required minimum distributions, Social Security, pensions, and Medicare surcharges are all in motion, the easiest planning window may already be gone.

This article is for educational purposes only and should not be treated as personalized tax advice. The new senior deduction should be evaluated with your tax advisor before making Roth conversion, withdrawal, capital gain, or charitable giving decisions.

---

by Peter Donisanu, ChFC®, AIF®