Wealth in Focus

Break The Fear That Won't Let You Enjoy What You Built

There's a point in retirement planning when the question changes.

For most of your working life, the question is straightforward: Am I saving enough?

You work. You save. You invest. You avoid unnecessary risks. And, over time, those habits help you build something substantial.

Then retirement arrives, and the question becomes very different: Can I actually use this money without worrying that I'll regret it later?

For some retirees, that question is surprisingly difficult to answer.

The financial plan may say they're fine. Their investments may be substantial. Social Security and pension income may cover a meaningful portion of their expenses.

Even after accounting for healthcare, inflation, taxes, market downturns, and a long retirement, the numbers may still show plenty of financial flexibility.

Yet the fear remains.

What if we live longer than expected?

What if the market falls?

What if healthcare becomes more expensive?

What if our kids eventually need help?

What if something happens that we haven't thought about yet?

Those aren't unreasonable questions. In fact, asking them is part of responsible retirement planning.

Research from the Society of Actuaries continues to show that running out of assets, inflation, healthcare costs, and unexpected financial shocks remain meaningful concerns for retirees.

However, there comes a point when prudence can quietly turn into paralysis.

And when that happens, the biggest risk to your retirement may no longer be running out of money.

It may be reaching the end of retirement with plenty of money left, but too many things you never gave yourself permission to do.

The Habit That Built Your Wealth Doesn't Automatically Retire With You

There's a reason this transition can be so difficult.

The behaviors that helped many successful families accumulate wealth are almost the exact opposite of the behaviors retirement eventually requires.

For decades, the formula was simple.

Earn more than you spend. Save the difference. Invest it. Leave it alone. Repeat.

Every dollar you didn't spend strengthened your financial position.

Then one day, retirement asks you to reverse a habit that may have been reinforced for 30 or 40 years.

Now you're supposed to withdraw money from accounts you spent decades filling.

You're supposed to book the trip rather than save for someday.

You're supposed to help your children or grandchildren while you're alive rather than simply leave everything behind.

And you're supposed to trust that spending money today won't somehow jeopardize tomorrow.

That's a big psychological shift.

One useful way to understand that tension comes from research on what psychologists and financial therapists call money scripts.

Money scripts are underlying beliefs about money that can influence the financial decisions we make.

Researchers Bradley Klontz, Sonya Britt, Jennifer Mentzer, and Ted Klontz originally identified four broad patterns: money avoidance, money worship, money status, and money vigilance.

More recent research examining the revised Money Script Inventory continues to find support for those four categories.

For the kind of retiree we're talking about here, money vigilance is particularly interesting.

Being vigilant about money isn't inherently bad.

Quite the opposite.

Being careful, prepared, private about finances, and concerned about maintaining adequate savings can support many of the behaviors that help someone build wealth in the first place.

That's why I wouldn't look at this as something that suddenly needs to be "fixed" when you retire.

The problem is that a belief can continue doing its old job long after your circumstances have changed.

The voice that once said, We need to save because we don't have enough yet, may still be saying the same thing after you've accumulated enough to fund the retirement you planned.

The circumstances changed.

The script didn't.

The Numbers Can Say Yes While Your Instincts Still Say No

I see variations of this tension regularly in financial planning conversations.

Someone will tell me that one of their primary goals is making sure they never run out of money.

That makes sense.

So, we build the plan around that concern. We model retirement income.

We evaluate investment risk.

We account for healthcare.

We build cash reserves. We examine taxes and withdrawal strategies. Then we stress-test the plan against different assumptions.

And once we've established what needs to be protected, we can begin asking a different set of questions.

Could you travel more?

Could you comfortably spend a little more each month?

Could you take the bigger family vacation?

Could you help your children or grandchildren today?

Could you replace the car, renovate the house, or make another large purchase without undermining the rest of the plan?

Sometimes we'll model those scenarios too.

And occasionally, something interesting happens.

The plan still works.

Yet the client remains hesitant.

At that point, we're no longer dealing primarily with a math problem.

We're dealing with the emotional residue of a lifetime spent protecting against the possibility of not having enough.

That's where the money-script concept becomes useful.

A projection can show us whether a particular level of spending appears financially sustainable. However, it can't automatically erase a belief about money that's been reinforced for most of someone's adult life.

That's an important distinction because another spreadsheet may not solve a problem the spreadsheet has already answered.

When "Enough" Never Feels Like Enough

One of the most difficult questions in wealth management is deceptively simple: How much is enough?

There's almost always another level of financial security available.

If $2 million feels safe, perhaps $3 million would feel safer.

If $3 million feels comfortable, perhaps $4 million would remove the uncertainty.

Then $4 million becomes $5 million.

The finish line can keep moving because the real objective was never a particular portfolio value. It was the feeling of certainty that the portfolio was supposed to provide.

Unfortunately, money can reduce uncertainty, but it can't eliminate it.

You can't know exactly how long you'll live.

You can't know what markets will do every year.

You can't know exactly what healthcare will cost.

And you certainly can't anticipate every financial need your family may have over the next several decades.

A good financial plan accounts for uncertainty. It doesn't pretend uncertainty can be eliminated.

That distinction matters.

Otherwise, you can continue accumulating more financial security while never actually feeling more secure.

Why Spending From the Portfolio Can Feel So Different

There's another wrinkle here.

Not all money feels the same when it's time to spend it.

Research by David Blanchett and Michael Finke using Health and Retirement Study data found that retirees consumed a much larger percentage of available lifetime income, such as Social Security and pension income, than they did from accumulated savings.

Their findings suggest that retirees' willingness to spend can depend partly on how the money reaches them.

That makes intuitive sense.

A Social Security check arrives and feels like income.

A pension payment arrives and feels like income.

But taking $10,000 out of an IRA can feel very different.

You've watched that account grow for decades. You've been taught not to touch it. You've probably celebrated when the balance went up and worried when it went down.

Now your retirement plan is telling you that the account exists, at least in part, to be spent.

Financially, that may be completely rational.

Emotionally, it can feel like moving backward.

And that's why the transition from accumulation to retirement can't be treated as purely a portfolio-management exercise.

Consider the Couple Who Keeps Saying "Maybe Next Year"

Imagine a retired couple who has done almost everything right.

They saved consistently.

They invested prudently.

They avoided excessive debt.

Their retirement income is coordinated. They maintain appropriate reserves. And their portfolio gives them considerably more flexibility than their basic lifestyle requires.

For years, they've talked about traveling more in retirement.

They've also talked about helping their grandchildren while they're young enough to see what that help makes possible.

Yet every year, the conversation sounds roughly the same.

Maybe we'll take the trip next year.

Maybe we should wait before giving the kids anything.

Maybe the market will be better.

Maybe we should keep a little more in reserve.

So, the money stays invested.

Another year passes.

Then another.

Nothing is necessarily wrong with that decision. Some people genuinely prefer spending less. Others intentionally want to leave a larger estate. Those are perfectly legitimate choices.

The question is why the decision is being made.

Is keeping the money part of the plan?

Or does spending it simply feel dangerous?

Those are two very different things.

This is a composite example based on recurring themes I've encountered in financial planning conversations. It doesn't represent the circumstances of any one client.

Your Financial Plan Should Help Separate Fear From Fact

This is where I think financial planning can play a role that goes beyond calculating a withdrawal rate.

The purpose isn't to convince someone to spend more money.

It's to help separate three things that can easily get mixed together: what needs to be protected, what the financial plan can reasonably support, and what fear is preventing you from doing.

First, we have to protect what matters.

That means understanding your recurring lifestyle needs, maintaining appropriate reserves, considering healthcare and long-term care risks, evaluating taxes, testing the portfolio against difficult markets, and accounting for the legacy you actually want to leave.

Those aren't fears to dismiss.

They're planning problems to address.

Then, once we've established those guardrails, we can test what's possible.

What happens if travel spending increases?

What happens if you help the family today instead of leaving all of the money later?

What happens if you spend more during the early years of retirement?

What happens if markets disappoint us?

What happens if inflation remains higher than expected?

The objective isn't to figure out the maximum amount you could possibly spend.

It's to understand the range of choices available to you without putting the priorities we've already protected at unnecessary risk.

Then comes the harder part.

If the plan says you can afford something and you still can't bring yourself to do it, it's worth asking:

What am I actually afraid will happen?

That's a different question than, "Can I afford it?"

And sometimes, it's the more important one.

The Goal Wasn't Just to Accumulate

This matters because retirement isn't simply the final stage of an accumulation plan.

It's the stage when some of the money finally gets to do the job you spent decades preparing it to do.

Perhaps that job is providing financial independence.

Perhaps it's creating experiences with your spouse while you're both healthy.

Perhaps it's helping children or grandchildren at a time when the money could materially change their lives.

Perhaps it's giving more to organizations you care about.

Or perhaps it's simply creating the ability to make ordinary financial decisions without worrying that one purchase will somehow undo 40 years of disciplined saving.

Research on retirement spending gives us some reason to pay attention to this issue.

Blanchett's more recent work finds that inflation-adjusted household spending generally declines as retirement progresses, including among relatively well-funded households.

That doesn't mean every retiree will spend less or that early retirement spending should automatically be increased.

However, it does challenge the assumption that every dollar preserved for later will necessarily have the same value to your life when later finally arrives.

At the same time, caution still matters. Research from EBRI shows that retirees face legitimate longevity and late-life financial risks, and asset-decumulation patterns vary considerably from household to household.

That's why this isn't an argument for reckless spending.

It's an argument for intentional spending.

Give Yourself Permission to Trust the Plan

For some people, the hard part of retirement planning isn't building the portfolio.

They've already done that.

The hard part is believing they no longer have to approach every dollar as though they're still preparing for an uncertain future.

And that's where I think good planning earns its keep.

The goal isn't simply to produce a probability-of-success number and hand you a report.

It's to help you understand what you can control, prepare for what you can't, and make informed decisions about the life you want to live with the resources you've built.

Sometimes the plan will tell us to be careful.

Sometimes it will tell us to wait.

Sometimes we'll need to change the investment strategy, reduce spending, increase reserves, or rethink a goal.

But sometimes the analysis has already done its job.

The risks have been considered.

The contingencies have been modeled.

The money is there.

And the thing standing between you and the life you planned isn't the portfolio anymore.

It's the fear that the portfolio was supposed to solve.

The goal was never to hold on tightest.

It was the freedom to use what you built.

So, name the fear. Understand where it may be coming from. Hold it up against the facts. Then give your financial plan permission to do something more than protect the money.

Let it help you use the money with purpose.

Because there comes a point when financial security isn't just having enough.

It's trusting that enough can finally be enough.

Sources

Klontz, Bradley T., Sonya L. Britt, Jennifer Mentzer, and Ted Klontz. "Money Beliefs and Financial Behaviors: Development of the Klontz Money Script Inventory." Journal of Financial Therapy, Vol. 2, Issue 1, 2011.
https://journals.newprairiepress.org/jft/article/id/5669/download/pdf/

Reiter, Miranda, Jesse B. Jurgenson, and Dee Warmath. "Evaluating the Klontz Money Script Inventory-Revised (KMSI-R): Factorial Validity, Internal Consistency, and Measurement Invariance with a Diverse Sample." Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 2025.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10834-025-10055-7

Blanchett, David, and Michael Finke. "Retirees Spend Lifetime Income, Not Savings." Financial Planning Review, Vol. 8, Issue 3, 2025.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cfp2.70010

Blanchett, David. "How Spending Evolves in Retirement: A Smile, a Smirk, or Something Else?" Financial Planning Review, 2026.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cfp2.70032

Society of Actuaries Research Institute. "2024 Retirement Risk Survey: Report of Findings." Published 2026.
https://www.soa.org/globalassets/assets/files/resources/research-report/2024/2024-retirement-risk-survey-series-final-report.pd

Employee Benefit Research Institute. "Asset Decumulation Over Retirement and the Role of Guaranteed Income Streams." EBRI Issue Brief, 2026.
https://www.ebri.org/content/asset-decumulation-over-retirement-and-the-role-of-guaranteed-income-streams

---

by Peter Donisanu, ChFC®, AIF®

Why the First Five Years of Retirement Decide the Next Twenty-Five

Most people think the biggest retirement risk shows up late, the fear of running out of money in your eighties or nineties.

However, the conditions that create that risk usually show up much earlier.

The first five years of retirement are a genuine hinge point. Your paycheck stops, withdrawals begin, and decisions about Social Security, taxes, healthcare, investments, and spending all start colliding with one another in ways they never did while you were working.

Those five years don't literally dictate everything that follows. Still, they have an outsized effect on how much flexibility your plan keeps for the twenty that come after.

That's why retirement shouldn't start with a portfolio balance and a withdrawal percentage. Instead, it should start with a plan for the stretch when your financial life is most exposed to change.

Retirement Changes the Math

While you're working, a market decline is uncomfortable, but it's survivable. You're still earning, still contributing, and you have time to let markets recover.

Retirement rewrites that equation.

Once withdrawals begin, your portfolio has to absorb two things at once, the market's swings and the money you're pulling out to live on. As a result, a decline in the first year or two can do far more damage than the same decline fifteen or twenty years later.

That's sequence-of-returns risk.

Two retirees can earn the exact same average return over their retirement and still end up in completely different places, depending on when their best and worst years land. In fact, the decumulation research keeps showing the same thing, that losses early in retirement, paired with ongoing withdrawals, can meaningfully shorten how long a portfolio lasts.

In other words, the average return in your projection doesn't tell the whole story. The order of those returns does.

Why an Early Loss Is So Hard to Recover From

Say you retire with $3 million and plan to draw $150,000 in your first year.

If the portfolio drops 20 percent before you take anything out, it falls to about $2.4 million. After that first $150,000 withdrawal, you're at roughly $2.25 million.

Now the portfolio has to recover from the loss and keep funding every withdrawal that follows.

By contrast, put that same 20 percent decline in year twenty, and the picture changes. By then you may have banked years of positive returns, shortened the horizon the money has to cover, or adjusted your spending. The drop still stings, but the plan is built to take it.

That's why, in our planning work, we don't just ask whether a portfolio can support a given withdrawal over thirty years. We also ask what happens if the bad years show up first.

What if the market falls in year one?

What if inflation stays hot?

What if the roof, the car, and a round of dental work all land in the same twelve months?

What if a large Roth conversion quietly triggers a Medicare premium increase?

A good plan answers those questions before you're forced to answer them in real time, under pressure.

The First Five Years Are About More Than Markets

Sequence risk matters, but markets are only half the story.

The early years of retirement are also when the big, hard-to-reverse decisions get made.

For example, take Social Security. Benefits generally grow for each year you delay claiming past full retirement age, up to age 70. That doesn't make delaying right for everyone, health, marital status, survivor needs, other income, and your withdrawal strategy all weigh in. However, once you claim, your options narrow.

Similarly, consider the window between retiring and the start of required minimum distributions. Your earned income may be lower in those years, which can open room for Roth conversions, capital-gain harvesting, charitable planning, or deliberate withdrawals from tax-deferred accounts. Under current rules, most retirees begin RMDs at age 73, though the exact age depends on your birth year.

Here's where it all ties together, and where a lot of plans go wrong. A Roth conversion can't be judged only by comparing today's tax rate to a future one. Higher income in a single year can raise your Medicare Part B and Part D premiums through IRMAA, pull more of your capital gains into tax, and reshape the tax bill your surviving spouse will one day face. These moves live in the same retirement tax window I've written about before, so I won't rebuild that case here.

The problem isn't that retirees make these decisions. Instead, it's that they too often make them one at a time, when the entire point is to coordinate them.

Two Couples, One Market, Two Outcomes

Picture two couples. Each retires at 65 with $3 million and needs about $150,000 a year to live the life they've planned for. In their first three years, both run into the same rough market.

The first couple keeps taking the full, inflation-adjusted withdrawal straight from the portfolio. They claim Social Security right away, because watching their investments fall makes them nervous. And they go ahead with a big travel year and a major renovation.

No single one of those choices is unreasonable. However, stacked together, in a down market, they pile pressure on a portfolio that's already shrinking.

The second couple runs a different play. They lean on a near-term cash reserve, so they're not selling growth investments into the decline. They separate essential spending from discretionary, and push part of the travel budget out a year. They rebalance back to their policy instead of reacting to the headlines. Finally, they revisit Social Security and Roth conversions in light of the new market and tax picture.

Same returns. Different retirement. The difference wasn't the market, it was the decisions they made around it.

The point isn't that every retiree needs that exact reserve or withdrawal order. Instead, it's that retirement resilience comes from having more than one way to respond.

Flexibility Might Be Your Most Valuable Retirement Asset

In planning conversations, I keep coming back to one distinction, the line between essential spending and flexible spending.

Essential is housing, food, insurance, healthcare, taxes, basic transportation. You can't cut those quickly.

Flexible is travel, gifts, renovations, the vehicle upgrade, the discretionary purchases. Those matter too, retirement is meant to be enjoyed, not endured. However, having some room to shift their timing can keep a temporary market drop from hardening into a permanent setback.

The withdrawal research backs this up. Dynamic strategies that adjust spending when the portfolio moves outside preset guardrails tend to hold up better than mechanically raising withdrawals every year, no matter what markets are doing.

That doesn't mean slashing spending every time the market has a bad month. Instead, it means deciding in advance what would actually trigger a change. For example, ordinary spending might continue through normal volatility, while the big discretionary items get a second look if the portfolio falls past a line you set ahead of time.

The value is in making that call while everyone's calm, not after fear has taken the wheel.

A Five-Year Retirement Stress Test

Before you retire, you want to know the plan can handle more than the expected case. Five tests get you most of the way there.

Test an early market decline

Instead of assuming smooth average returns, model a real drop in year one or two. Then map out exactly how you'd fund spending without abandoning your long-term strategy, whether that's cash, short-term fixed income, trimmed discretionary spending, or another income source. "We'll figure it out when it happens" isn't a strategy.

Separate recurring and irregular spending

A monthly budget is necessary but not sufficient. Roofs, cars, family support, big trips, and uncovered healthcare arrive in lumps, and they belong in the model separately from ordinary lifestyle spending. Otherwise, a plan can look sustainable while quietly ignoring the retirement spending blind spot most likely to derail it.

Build a multiyear tax map

Retirement tax planning shouldn't be done one April at a time. Instead, project your income out through the start of RMDs and beyond, find the years when taxable income dips, and test whether Roth conversions or other moves improve your lifetime tax position, not just this year's return. Then check how each move ripples into IRMAA, capital gains, charitable goals, and your surviving spouse.

Name the permanent decisions

Social Security claiming, pension elections, selling the house, large gifts, certain insurance choices. Some of these can't be undone. Before you act, get clear on what's reversible and what isn't. When uncertainty is high, keeping your options open is often worth more than locking in a permanent answer early.

Set your guardrails

Finally, decide ahead of time how the plan responds when things move. What happens if spending runs 10 percent over plan? If the portfolio drops? If one spouse dies earlier than expected? If a child needs help? If you want a second home? A plan is far more useful when it holds decision rules, not just projections.

The Goal Isn't to Predict the First Five Years

Nobody knows what markets, inflation, tax law, healthcare, or your family will do in your first five years of retirement.

Fortunately, a strong retirement plan never required a crystal ball. It requires preparation.

Those first five years matter because that's when withdrawals begin, the big elections get made, and the portfolio has the least room for an avoidable mistake. However, they don't have to dictate the rest of your retirement. A coordinated plan gives you room to respond, through appropriate reserves, flexibility in your discretionary spending, coordinated tax decisions, a disciplined portfolio, and a plan you actually revisit as life changes.

So before you circle a retirement date, don't ask only whether you've saved enough. Ask whether the plan can survive an unfavorable start.

Because the strength of a retirement plan isn't how well it works when everything goes right. It's how much flexibility you've still got when something goes wrong. That's where clarity, confidence, and peace of mind actually come from.

If you'd like to pressure-test your own first five years, especially how your withdrawals, Social Security timing, and Roth conversions interact before the difficult years get a vote, that's the conversation we have every day. We'd be glad to have it with you.

Sources

Social Security Administration. "Delayed Retirement Credits."
https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/delayret.html

Internal Revenue Service. "Retirement Plan and IRA Required Minimum Distributions FAQs."
https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/retirement-plan-and-ira-required-minimum-distributions-faqs

Social Security Administration. "Medicare Premiums: Rules for Higher-Income Beneficiaries" (income-related monthly adjustment amounts for Part B and Part D).
https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/medicare/medicare-premiums.html

Jonathan Guyton and William Klinger. "Decision Rules and Maximum Initial Withdrawal Rates." Journal of Financial Planning, March 2006.
https://www.financialplanningassociation.org/article/journal/MAR06-decision-rules-and-maximum-initial-withdrawal-rates

Morningstar. "The State of Retirement Income."
https://www.morningstar.com/retirement/morningstars-retirement-income-research-finding-your-safe-withdrawal-rate

---

by Peter Donisanu, ChFC®, AIF®

Retirement: 8 Tests Before You Leave Your Paycheck Behind

Retirement shouldn’t begin with a guess.

Still, that’s effectively what happens when someone chooses a retirement date based primarily on the balance of an investment account.

The number may look substantial. The financial projection may show a high probability of success. And after decades of working and saving, it may finally feel like the right time to leave.

However, retirement readiness isn’t determined by one number.

Instead, it depends on whether the major pieces of your financial life can continue working together after your paycheck stops.

In our planning work, we don’t begin the retirement conversation by asking whether someone has reached a particular portfolio balance. We begin by looking at what the paycheck currently supports, what will replace it, and which financial decisions could put the most pressure on the plan after retirement.

That process usually requires more than an investment projection.

It requires a retirement readiness test.

Why Your Retirement Number Isn’t Enough

Most people begin with a straightforward question:

Do I have enough money to retire?

That’s an important question. However, it’s also incomplete.

Two couples could each have $4 million saved and have very different levels of retirement readiness.

One couple may have no debt, predictable spending, substantial taxable savings, two pensions, and both spouses already enrolled in Medicare.

Meanwhile, the other couple may have a large mortgage, most of its wealth in tax-deferred retirement accounts, several years to go before Medicare, and ongoing financial responsibilities for parents or adult children.

The account balances may be identical.

Nevertheless, the retirement decisions aren’t.

That’s because a portfolio can tell you how much you’ve accumulated, but it can’t tell you whether your spending is realistic, whether your tax strategy is coordinated, or whether your family is prepared for an unexpected health or caregiving event.

So, before choosing a retirement date, we believe the plan should pass eight readiness tests.

Test 1: Do You Know What Retirement Will Actually Cost?

First, you need a dependable estimate of what you’ll spend.

That sounds simple. Yet, in practice, it’s often one of the least developed parts of a retirement plan.

Many households know approximately what comes out of their checking account each month. However, that number may not include irregular expenses such as travel, home repairs, vehicle replacements, financial support for family members, or large insurance premiums.

Additionally, retirement spending rarely remains constant.

During the early years, you may spend more on travel, hobbies, dining, or home projects. Later, those expenses may decline while healthcare, home assistance, or caregiving costs increase.

As a result, one static spending assumption may not adequately describe a retirement that could last 25 or 30 years.

When we review retirement spending, we separate expenses into three broad categories:

• Core expenses are the costs required to maintain your household, including housing, utilities, food, insurance, and basic healthcare.
• Lifestyle expenses include travel, entertainment, gifts, hobbies, and other discretionary spending.
• Contingent expenses are costs that may not occur every year but still need to be planned for, such as major home repairs, helping an aging parent, or replacing a vehicle.

This distinction matters because each category has a different level of flexibility.

If markets decline, you may be comfortable postponing a large trip. However, you probably won’t be able to postpone property taxes, health insurance premiums, or a new roof.

Therefore, the first readiness test isn’t whether your portfolio can support one spending number.

It’s whether you understand which expenses are essential, which are flexible, and which could surprise you.

Test 2: Do You Know What Will Replace Your Paycheck?

Once spending is clear, the next step is mapping out your retirement income.

That may include Social Security, pensions, investment income, retirement account withdrawals, rental income, deferred compensation, or part-time work.

However, income planning isn’t simply a matter of adding those sources together.

Timing matters.

For example, you may retire several years before claiming Social Security. A pension may not begin immediately. Deferred compensation may arrive in large installments rather than predictable monthly payments.

Consequently, the first several years of retirement may place more pressure on your portfolio than the later years.

The plan should also consider what happens after the first spouse dies.

A married couple receiving two Social Security payments may eventually become a surviving household receiving one benefit. A surviving spouse may qualify for the higher applicable benefit, but the two payments generally aren’t added together.

Meanwhile, many household expenses may remain largely unchanged.

The surviving spouse may still have the same house, property taxes, insurance premiums, and maintenance costs. However, the household may now have less income and narrower federal tax brackets.

Therefore, a retirement income plan shouldn’t work only while both spouses are alive.

It should also be tested for the survivor.

Test 3: Do You Have Enough Liquidity?

Next, you need to determine how much money should remain readily available.

Retirement changes the role of cash.

While you’re working, a paycheck can replenish your checking account after a large expense. Once you retire, that expense may need to be funded by selling investments or withdrawing money from a retirement account.

That can become a problem during a market decline.

If you’re forced to sell investments after they’ve fallen, you’re not only realizing the loss. You’re also removing assets that would otherwise have the opportunity to participate in a recovery.

That’s why we don’t view a retirement cash reserve as idle money.

Instead, it’s a source of financial flexibility.

The appropriate amount will vary by household. However, it should generally reflect near-term spending needs, known major purchases, the reliability of outside income, and the level of risk in the investment portfolio.

At the same time, holding too much cash can create another problem. Over long periods, inflation can reduce its purchasing power.

So, the goal isn’t to move everything out of the market before retirement.

Rather, the goal is to maintain enough liquidity that you won’t need to make a rushed investment decision simply because a bill is due.

Test 4: Have You Built a Retirement Tax Strategy?

Taxes don’t disappear when your paycheck stops.

In many cases, they become more complicated.

During your working years, income may come primarily from wages. In retirement, however, cash flow may come from several sources with different tax characteristics.

Traditional retirement account withdrawals are generally taxable. Qualified Roth withdrawals may be tax-free. Brokerage account sales may create capital gains. Social Security may become taxable depending on the household’s other income.

Meanwhile, higher income can also increase Medicare Part B and Part D premiums through income-related monthly adjustment amounts.

Therefore, the question isn’t simply which account has money available.

The better question is which account should fund spending this year without creating unnecessary problems in future years.

For instance, the period after retirement but before required minimum distributions begin may create an opportunity to recognize income intentionally through Roth conversions.

However, that doesn’t mean converting as much as possible.

A Roth conversion can affect federal and state taxes, Medicare premiums, capital-gain taxation, healthcare subsidies before Medicare, and the amount of cash available for spending.

Additionally, required minimum distributions generally apply to traditional IRAs and many employer retirement plans under current tax rules.

As a result, the tax strategy should look beyond this year’s tax return.

It should consider the full retirement timeline.

The objective isn’t necessarily to pay the least amount of tax in one particular year. Instead, it’s to manage lifetime taxes while preserving the flexibility to fund the life you want.

Test 5: Have You Planned for Healthcare?

Healthcare is one of the biggest variables in the retirement decision.

If you retire before age 65, you’ll need to determine how you’ll maintain coverage until Medicare begins.

Depending on your circumstances, that may involve coverage through a spouse, COBRA, an Affordable Care Act marketplace plan, or private insurance.

However, the premium is only part of the cost.

You’ll also need to consider deductibles, copays, prescription expenses, dental care, vision care, and out-of-pocket limits.

Then, once Medicare begins, the planning doesn’t stop.

Original Medicare doesn’t cover every healthcare expense. For example, it generally doesn’t cover most routine dental care, hearing aids, or long-term custodial care.

That distinction is important.

Medicare may cover qualifying short-term skilled nursing care under certain conditions. However, it generally doesn’t cover ongoing custodial care when help with activities such as bathing, dressing, or eating is the only care required.

Therefore, a complete healthcare review should address two different risks:

The first is how you’ll pay for medical coverage and routine healthcare expenses.

The second is how you’d fund an extended-care need that Medicare may not cover.

Without both pieces, an otherwise strong retirement plan may still contain a significant blind spot.

Test 6: Do Your Debt and Housing Decisions Support the Plan?

Next, consider the role of debt.

A mortgage payment that felt manageable during your working years may feel different when it’s funded through portfolio withdrawals.

At the same time, paying off the mortgage immediately before retirement isn’t automatically the right answer.

For example, withdrawing a large amount from a traditional IRA could create a sizable tax bill. Using taxable savings to eliminate the mortgage could reduce the liquidity available for healthcare, home repairs, or a market downturn.

Therefore, the question isn’t simply whether you can pay off the house.

It’s whether paying it off improves the overall plan.

Housing also needs to be evaluated beyond the mortgage.

Consider whether the home will remain:

• Affordable to maintain
• Physically accessible
• Close to family and healthcare
• Appropriate for the lifestyle you want
• Practical if one spouse is living there alone

A retirement projection may assume that you’ll stay in the same home indefinitely. However, that assumption should be tested rather than accepted automatically.

Ultimately, the home should support your retirement.

Your retirement shouldn’t exist primarily to support the home.

Test 7: Are Your Protection and Estate Plans Current?

As retirement approaches, insurance needs often change.

Disability insurance may become less important once earned income stops. Meanwhile, long-term care, property, liability, and umbrella coverage may become more important.

Life insurance also deserves a fresh review.

Some policies may no longer be necessary because the original income-replacement need has declined. However, other policies may still play a role in supporting a surviving spouse, providing liquidity, funding a legacy goal, or covering an estate-planning need.

The objective isn’t to cancel every policy once you retire.

Instead, it’s to determine whether each policy still has a specific job.

The same principle applies to your estate plan.

Wills, trusts, financial powers of attorney, healthcare directives, and beneficiary designations should reflect your current wishes and family circumstances.

However, estate planning isn’t only about transferring assets after death.

It’s also about preparing for incapacity.

Your family should know who can make financial and medical decisions, where important documents are located, and how essential accounts and bills will be managed during an emergency.

Otherwise, a financially sound retirement plan may become difficult to implement precisely when your family needs it most.

Test 8: Are You Personally Ready to Retire?

Finally, retirement readiness isn’t purely financial.

Work provides more than income.

It may also provide structure, identity, relationships, intellectual stimulation, and a sense of purpose.

Once work ends, those things don’t automatically replace themselves.

That’s why we ask clients to think beyond the retirement date.

What will an ordinary Tuesday look like?

How will you spend your time after the initial travel and home projects are complete?

How will you maintain friendships and social connections?

What will give you a sense of progress or contribution?

And if you’re married, have you and your spouse discussed what each of you expects retirement to look like?

A person can be financially prepared to retire and still struggle with the transition.

Conversely, someone may feel emotionally ready to leave but discover that the financial pieces haven’t yet been coordinated.

A durable retirement plan needs both.

What a $4 Million Portfolio Doesn’t Tell You

Consider a hypothetical married couple with $4 million in total savings and investments.

At first glance, they appear ready to retire.

However, the account balance doesn’t reveal the full picture.

Of the $4 million, assume $2.8 million is held in traditional tax-deferred retirement accounts. Another $700,000 is held in a taxable brokerage account, $300,000 is in Roth accounts, and $200,000 is in cash.

The couple estimates that they spend approximately $160,000 per year. However, that estimate doesn’t fully include irregular home repairs, vehicle replacements, or travel.

They also have a mortgage costing approximately $4,000 per month.

Additionally, one spouse is several years away from Medicare eligibility. The couple expects to provide roughly $18,000 per year of support to an aging parent, and their estate documents haven’t been updated in more than 10 years.

Neither spouse has started Social Security.

So, are they ready?

Possibly.

However, the $4 million balance alone can’t answer the question.

Before choosing a retirement date, the couple would need to determine:

• Whether $160,000 accurately reflects their full spending
• How much additional money is needed for health insurance
• Whether the mortgage should be maintained, refinanced, or paid off
• How family support affects sustainable withdrawals
• Which accounts should fund the first several years
• Whether partial Roth conversions improve the long-term tax picture
• How the plan changes when Social Security begins
• Whether the surviving spouse can maintain the household
• How much cash should remain outside the investment portfolio
• Whether estate and incapacity documents need to be updated

The couple may discover that they can retire as planned.

Alternatively, they may decide to work one more year, reduce a planned expense, restructure the mortgage, or create a more deliberate withdrawal strategy.

The purpose of the analysis isn’t to push retirement further away.

Instead, it’s to replace uncertainty with informed tradeoffs.

Test the Full Plan Before Choosing the Date

Before submitting your retirement notice, step back and review the entire financial system that will need to replace your paycheck.

Do you understand what retirement will cost?

Do you know where your income will come from?

Do you have enough liquidity to avoid selling investments at the wrong time?

Have you coordinated taxes, healthcare, housing, insurance, and estate planning?

Have you tested what happens if markets fall, inflation remains elevated, a spouse dies, or a family member needs help?

And just as importantly, do you know what you’re retiring to?

The goal isn’t to eliminate every uncertainty.

That’s impossible.

Instead, the goal is to identify the decisions that matter most, understand the tradeoffs, and make sure the major pieces of your financial life can continue working together.

Because retirement readiness isn’t determined by whether you’ve reached one particular number.

It’s determined by whether the full plan is ready to support the life that comes next.

Sources

• Internal Revenue Service, required minimum distribution guidance. https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/plan-participant-employee/retirement-topics-required-minimum-distributions-rmds
• Social Security Administration, retirement and survivor-benefit guidance. https://www.ssa.gov/survivor/amount
• Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare premiums and income-related adjustments. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/2026-medicare-parts-b-premiums-deductibles
• Medicare.gov, services not covered by Original Medicare and long-term-care guidance. https://www.medicare.gov/coverage/long-term-care

---

by Peter Donisanu, ChFC®, AIF®

When Gas Prices Move, Your Plan Shouldn’t Panic

Gas prices are back in the headlines.

The national average price of a gallon of gasoline has moved above $4.50, up nearly 50% since the start of the U.S.-Iran conflict in late February. The main issue is oil supply. Roughly 20% of the world’s oil moves through the Strait of Hormuz, a major shipping route in the Middle East, and traffic through that route remains well below pre-conflict levels.

When less oil is moving through the system, crude prices rise. When crude prices rise, gas prices usually follow.

And this does not stop at the pump.

Higher diesel prices eventually show up in the cost of moving goods by truck. That means the pressure can work its way into grocery prices, household goods, and other everyday expenses. In other words, what begins as an energy story can quickly become a household budget story.

Moments like this tend to produce a lot of predictions.

Where will oil go next? How high will gas prices get? How long will this last?

Those are interesting questions, but they are not always the most useful ones.

The better question is: what, if anything, should this change in your financial life right now?

For most households, the answer is not “rewrite the plan.” The answer is usually much simpler. It is to look at where the pressure is showing up and make sure the adjustment is intentional.

Three questions are worth asking.

Question #1: Where is the gas price increase being absorbed?

For a household with two cars, higher fuel prices may add roughly $1,200 to $1,800 per year in additional spending.

That money has to come from somewhere.

For some families, it quietly reduces the amount being saved each month. For retirees, it may increase the amount being withdrawn from the portfolio. For others, it may simply crowd out other discretionary spending.

None of those outcomes is automatically wrong.

The issue is whether the change is happening by choice or by default.

That is the practical planning question. Are you comfortable absorbing the increase where it is currently landing? Or would it make more sense to temporarily adjust something else, such as delaying a purchase, trimming a discretionary category, or reducing short-term savings for a season?

In most cases, this kind of price increase does not require a major financial planning change.

But it does deserve a quick look.

Small pressures are easier to manage when they are noticed early.

Question #2: Is this year’s spending still tracking the retirement income plan?

For retirees, the question becomes more specific.

Is this year’s spending still in line with the plan, or is it beginning to run ahead of it?

A temporary stretch of higher fuel and grocery costs is usually something a well-built retirement plan can absorb. That is one reason we build plans with flexibility, not precision down to the penny.

But it is still worth checking.

The simple exercise is to compare actual spending over the past several months with what the plan assumed for the year. Then look at the trend.

Is the gap closing as prices stabilize? Or is it widening as higher costs spread into more parts of the budget?

That distinction matters.

The goal is not to overreact. The goal is to identify whether a small adjustment today can prevent a larger adjustment later.

That is one of the quiet benefits of ongoing planning. It gives you room to respond before something becomes urgent.

Question #3: Does higher inflation change the long-term plan?

Usually, no.

A financial plan is not built around one year of inflation. It is built around long-term assumptions that play out over decades.

That means a stretch of 4% inflation, even if it lasts several quarters, does not automatically change the long-term plan. The plan was designed with the understanding that some years will be higher, some years will be lower, and the actual path will never move in a straight line.

For those approaching retirement, the better question is whether the retirement income target still reflects the life you are planning to live.

For those still saving, it is a reminder that the cost of the future is not fixed. The number you are working toward needs to be reviewed over time because life, markets, taxes, and inflation all change.

That is not a flaw in the plan.

That is the reason planning is an ongoing process.

The Bottom Line

Higher gas prices are frustrating because they are visible, frequent, and hard to ignore.

You see the price every time you fill up. You feel it when the grocery bill runs higher. You notice it when the monthly budget feels a little tighter than it did a few months ago.

But from a planning perspective, this is not a reason to panic.

It is a reason to pay attention.

The price at the pump is a reminder that the cost of living is not a fixed number. But it is still only one input in a plan designed around a much longer time horizon.

Good planning does not require reacting to every headline.

It requires knowing which headlines matter, asking the right questions, and making small adjustments before they become large ones.

---

by Peter Donisanu, ChFC®, AIF®

More Money, More Mess: The Hidden Cost of Uncoordinated Wealth

Many people assume that as their net worth grows, their financial life gets simpler. In practice, the opposite is often true. Growing wealth tends to create a quiet kind of clutter that doesn't show up on a balance sheet, but shows up in missed opportunities, unnecessary taxes, and decisions that no longer match the life you're living today.

This clutter rarely announces itself. It builds slowly, one account and one decision at a time, until it becomes difficult to see how all the pieces fit together.

How Financial Clutter Builds Over Time

Financial clutter isn't usually a sign of poor discipline. It's often a sign of a life that has moved forward. You changed jobs, so you left a 401(k) behind. You inherited an IRA. You opened a brokerage account at one firm, then another at a different firm because someone recommended it. You bought a life insurance policy in your thirties, and another one later for estate purposes. You worked with a CPA, then a different CPA, then an attorney who drafted a trust your current advisor has never reviewed.

Each of those decisions made sense at the time. The issue is that no one stepped back to ask how they all fit together. Most clutter isn't the result of bad advice. It's the result of good advice given in isolation, year after year, without a plan to connect the pieces.

What Coordinated Planning Does

Turning clutter into clarity isn't a matter of starting over. It's a matter of giving every piece of your financial life a defined role and making sure those roles work together. A coordinated plan does a few specific things that piecemeal decisions can't.

It gives each account a job. Some assets are better suited for current income, others for long-term growth, and others for heirs or charitable goals. When each account has a clear purpose tied to the overall plan, day-to-day decisions become easier and more consistent.

It sequences withdrawals with taxes in mind. The order in which you draw from taxable, tax-deferred, and Roth accounts can meaningfully affect your lifetime tax bill, your Medicare premiums, and how long your portfolio lasts. A coordinated plan looks at these decisions together rather than one year at a time.

It uses planning windows that are easy to miss. The years between retirement and the start of Required Minimum Distributions can be one of the most valuable periods for Roth conversions, capital gains planning, and charitable strategies. Without a plan, those years often pass without being fully used.

It revisits the pieces you may have forgotten. Older insurance policies, annuities, and legacy accounts sometimes continue to serve a purpose, and sometimes they no longer do. A coordinated review asks whether each one still fits, and what to do if it doesn't.

It aligns your accounts with your estate plan. Beneficiary designations often override what your will or trust says. A coordinated plan makes sure the titling of your accounts, the designations on retirement plans and insurance, and the structure of your estate documents all point in the same direction.

The Big Takeaway

A well-built plan doesn't add. It organizes. It ties your investments, tax planning, insurance, and estate documents together into a single picture of the life you want to fund and the legacy you want to leave. The goal isn't to own more. It's to make sure what you already own is working together.

Every household's situation is different, and the right path forward depends on your goals, your family, and how you want retirement and legacy to look. Our goal is to help you turn financial clutter into clarity, so the wealth you've worked hard to build can serve the life you actually want.

---

by Peter Donisanu, ChFC®, AIF®