Key Updates on the Economy & Markets
The first quarter of 2026 was one of those periods that reminded investors why markets don’t move in a straight line.
Stocks started the year on solid footing with January modestly positive, February quiet, and then March arriving with a jolt. The escalation of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, including the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, sent oil prices surging and rattled markets in ways that few anticipated heading into the year.
By the time the quarter closed, the S&P 500 was down -4.3%, with the bulk of that decline concentrated in a single month. And if you looked only at that headline number, you might walk away with a grim picture.
But the quarter was more nuanced than the index suggests, and I think it’s worth taking a step back to understand what actually happened and what it means for your portfolio going forward.
Higher Oil Prices Changed the Rate Cut Conversation
Indeed, to understand why March felt so disruptive, you have to start with oil.
Crude prices had already been moving higher before tensions escalated with supply concerns tied to Venezuelan output pushing prices up nearly 13% in January, and climbing another 4% in February as geopolitical risks continued to build.
Then March arrived.
The conflict between the U.S. and Iran intensified, and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a waterway that carries roughly 20% of the world’s oil, sent crude prices surging nearly 50% in a single month. For the full quarter, oil prices rose more than 70%, reaching levels not seen since mid-2022.
And why does that matter for your portfolio?
Because oil prices don’t exist in a vacuum. Higher energy costs flow through to what consumers and businesses pay for goods and services. And as a matter of fact, you’ve likely already noticed it at the pump, as gasoline prices have risen nearly a dollar per gallon since late February.
And this is happening at a moment when inflation was already showing signs of firming before the conflict began. The Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation measure, Core PCE, remains near 3%, and producer prices have been trending higher.
So then, coming into 2026, the market expected the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates two to three times by year end.
That expectation quietly eroded as the quarter progressed.
And by the time March ended, those rate cuts had been priced out entirely, and there was even early discussion about whether a rate hike might come back into the conversation.
The situation is still evolving.
The Strait of Hormuz remains closed as of quarter-end, negotiations are ongoing, and oil is trading near $100 per barrel, a signal that the market expects the disruption to persist for some time.
The April and May inflation reports will be the first data to fully reflect the energy price surge, and they’ll go a long way toward shaping the Federal Reserve’s next move. In the meantime, headlines out of the Middle East are likely to continue influencing how both stocks and bonds behave in early Q2.
Diversification Quietly Did Its Job
Now, one of the most important, and most overlooked, stories of Q1 was what happened beneath the surface of the S&P 500.
The S&P 500 is a market-cap weighted index, meaning the largest companies carry the most influence over the index’s return. When those large companies, particularly those in the technology sector, sold off, the headline number felt worse than what most diversified investors actually experienced.
To put it in perspective, the average S&P 500 stock outperformed the broad index by nearly 5% in Q1. Small-cap stocks, as measured by the Russell 2000, actually gained nearly 1%. And international stocks finished the quarter with a gain of nearly 1% as well, outperforming the S&P 500 by more than 5 percentage points.
And what drove that gap? Well, there were two competing forces at work.
The first was a rotation away from mega-cap tech stocks. For the past two years, a handful of the largest companies drove the majority of the market’s gains.
In January, investors started moving away from that concentrated trade. The rotation accelerated in February when concerns about artificial intelligence disruption spread through the software sector, and markets began to price AI not just as a productivity enhancer, but as a potential replacement for entire categories of professional services.
The software sector has now declined nearly 30% from its peak last October, one of the largest non-recessionary drawdowns in over 30 years.
The second force was a genuine improvement in manufacturing activity. After spending nearly a year in contraction, the ISM Manufacturing Index crossed into expansion territory in February and held there in March.
That’s a meaningful sign for the economy and potentially for corporate earnings.
Indeed, the manufacturing sector had been a soft spot in the economy since 2022, and the data suggested it was gaining real traction before the conflict began. Industrials was one of the few sectors to set a new all-time high during the quarter.
Across the broader equity market, six of the eleven S&P 500 sectors outperformed the index, a sharp contrast to recent years when gains were driven by just a few names. Energy led everything with a 38% return as oil surged.
Materials, Utilities, and Consumer Staples each gained more than 7.5%. On the other end, Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Financials each declined more than 9%.
The gap between the best and worst sectors was wide. But for investors with diversified exposure across company sizes, sectors, and geographies, the quarter felt more moderate than the S&P 500 return alone would suggest.
Diversification didn’t eliminate the volatility. It helped manage it, and that’s exactly what it’s designed to do.
Bonds Navigated a Volatile Quarter
The bond market had its own version of the quarter’s turbulence.
Interest rates rose in January as tariff concerns resurfaced, then fell sharply in February as growth worries, particularly around AI disruption, pulled investors toward safer assets.
March reversed that move quickly.
And as oil prices spiked and rate cut expectations faded, yields climbed again. The 10-year Treasury yield ended the quarter near 4.32%, its highest level since mid-2022. The 2-year yield rose nearly 0.35% for the quarter, reflecting how quickly rate cut expectations shifted.
The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index finished the quarter flat, a meaningful step down from the 1% or better returns it produced in each of the prior four quarters. Corporate bonds modestly underperformed higher-quality Treasuries, and credit spreads widened to their highest levels since early 2025.
That widening reflects caution, not crisis, with corporate spreads remaining well below the levels reached during past recessions and financial dislocations.
And what are we to take of all this data?
Well, the bond market is telling us that investors are being careful, but it’s not telling us something is broken yet.
What to Watch in Q2
As we move into the second quarter, the central story remains the same: the Middle East, oil prices, inflation, and what the Federal Reserve does next.
Progress toward resolving the Strait of Hormuz closure would ease energy costs and give the Fed more room to maneuver on rates. However, a prolonged disruption means higher oil prices have more time to work through to consumers and businesses, keeping inflation elevated and leaving the Fed in a difficult position.
From a data perspective, the April and May inflation reports are the ones to watch. They’ll be the first readings to capture the full impact of higher energy costs, and they’ll shape the rate outlook for the rest of the year.
While you’re watching those headlines, I want to offer some perspective on the bigger picture.
Over the past 26 years, corporate earnings and stock prices have moved together with a 96% correlation.
When earnings rise, prices generally follow.
When earnings deteriorate, as they did in 2001, 2008, and 2020, prices tend to fall with them. What’s notable about today’s environment is that earnings estimates have continued to rise even as the S&P 500 has pulled back.
Analysts still expect earnings growth in the coming quarters, and profit margins to remain healthy.
Put differently, the market’s decline in Q1 was driven by uncertainty around oil, inflation, and Federal Reserve policy, not by a deterioration in the underlying fundamentals that drive stock prices over time.
And that distinction matters.
Certainly, uncertainty is uncomfortable, but it’s different from a breakdown in the economic foundation.
The quarter also reinforced something I believe deeply in that staying invested, staying diversified, and keeping a long-term perspective is one of the most effective strategies available to investors. The areas of the market that led over the past two years underperformed in Q1.
Investors with broad exposure across company sizes, styles, and geographies experienced a meaningfully different quarter than the headlines suggested.
When it comes down to it, markets will work through the uncertainty in the Middle East. The data will come in, the Fed will respond, and conditions will shift, as they always do.
In the meantime, your plan was built for periods like this one, and I remain confident in the approach we have in place.
